Open Source Databases Keep Chipping Away at Oracle’s Empire


open-source-database

Getty Images



The three fastest growing databases of 2014 were all open source, according to a new report from DB-Engines, a site that tracks popularity in the rapidly changing database marketplace.

The ever popular new-age database MongoDB topped the list again this year, with Redis, a tool for managing data, and ElasticSearch, which provides the foundations for building your own search engine, as runners up.


The lesson, both this year and last: if you want to gain traction in the database management system market, its a good idea to open source the thing, making the code freely available to the world at large.


The flagship product from software giant Oracle has dominated the database landscape for years, and it’s still sitting pretty at the top of the DB-Engines ranking, followed closely by MySQL, a database the company acquired as part of its purchase of Sun Microsystems in 2009. But the market has diversified in recent years, thanks to new data management techniques pioneered by the likes of Google and Amazon.


Drawing on these techniques, so-called “NoSQL” databases ditch the traditional relational database structure of storing data in neat rows and columns and enable developers to spread data across hundreds or thousands of servers—or develop much simpler applications that don’t as much structure. Oracle has tried to break into this field with its own Oracle NoSQL database and Oracle Big Data Appliance, but the real action remains in the world of open source, according to DB-Engines.


DB-Engines_Ranking_Open_Source_vs__Commercial_DBMS


The DB-Engines ranking system was created by the Austrian technology consulting firm Solid IT to help its developers decide which new technologies were worth learning about and which were marginal. To rank databases, Solid IT analyzes data from many sources, such as Google Trends, LinkedIn, and various job listing sites, and assigns each system a score. To determine the fastest growing database systems, the company looked at which ones had the biggest change in their scores.


Closed source databases like Oracle, Microsoft SQL, and IBM DB2 are still enormously popular, according to DB-Engines, but the fastest growing databases are all open source. And according to a separate report, open source overall databases are gaining traction faster than closed source databases.


Last year’s biggest movers were MongoDB, the more traditional database PostgreSQL and Cassandra, a big data system open sourced by Facebook. This year, MongoDB is still growing faster than any other database system. It’s now the 5th most popular database overall.


Redis, which took second place, has long been the third most popular NoSQL database on DB-Engines, and its popularity is continuing to grow. Unlike systems like Cassandra and Hbase, which focus on juggling enormous amounts of data, Redis is designed to help developers handle small amounts of quickly changing data, such as whether a particular user is logged in or not, and what’s in their shopping cart.


But according to Solid IT co-founder Matthias Gelbmann, it’s starting to be used for more than just that. “We often see, that once Redis is installed for caching, and people see the speed and reliability of it, they start moving more and more functionality there,” he wrote in a blog post about the DB-Engines rankings.


Meanwhile, ElasticSearch provides another piece of the data puzzle: it makes it easier to actually find all the information that you collect. Not unlike closed source products from companies like Autonomy, ElasticSearch can be used to index internal documents and other files so that companies can create their own internal Google-style search engines.


A similar piece of software called Solr actually ranks higher on the DB-Engines list. But ElasticSearch, the newer of the two open source search engine platforms, had more growth in 2014. This suggests the two products might finally be on their way to displacing closed source alternatives.



No comments:

Post a Comment