France Is Letting 14-Year-Olds Drive This Tiny Electric Car

Renault_31700_global_en The Renault Twizy city car. Ralph Richter/Renault



Being 14 sucks. You’re a freshman in high school, which puts you at the bottom of the social food chain. The opposite sex is endlessly confusing, you need to beg your parents and older siblings for rides, and (in the US at least) you’re half a lifetime away from the legal drinking age. Unless, that is, you live in France. Then you just need to beg your parents to buy you a Renault Twizy, a $7,600 “car” that 14-year-olds can now legally drive.


The Twizy is a quadricycle, a 1,000-pound, two-seat electric car meant for zipping around cramped European cities. It’s designed to be a safer alternative to bicycles and scooters for the urban set, sporting a 13-horsepower electric motor and enough batteries to take you 60 miles at a maximum speed of 50 mph. It won’t hold much cargo, but it’s got plenty of room for your baguettes, cigarettes, wine, and “On Strike” signs (because yes, French high schoolers love to faire la grève).


The Twizy has airbags, seat belts, two seats, headlights, turn signals—all those things that actual cars have. And, thanks to new legislation in France, youths as young as 14 can now drive the things legally.


Previously, 14-year olds in France with a road safety certificate (sort of a lightweight-version of a driver’s license) could only ride mopeds. Now, in order to comply with EU regulations, that same certificate now allows holders to drive “quadricycles”.


As regulated, quadricycles are four-wheeled cars that can’t exceed 28 mph, can’t have a battery pack bigger than 4 kWh (for electric engines, traditional gas and diesel versions can’t have an engine bigger than 50cc), and can’t exceed 770 pounds curb weight. To accommodate the new market, Renault is releasing a special, scaled down, slower version of the Twizy specifically for youngsters with a road safety certificate.


Renault says it’s sold some 15,000 Twizys in Europe since launching the thing half a decade ago, and we would love to see the automaker jump the pond and let American teens, or adults, climb in. Unlike other small European cars like the Smart, which is actually kind of expensive (base price is around $13,000), an $8,000 Twizy would be great for city-dwellers who want something faster and safer than a bicycle, and nearly as versatile. We could see it being popular for car-sharing services like Zipcar or as an alternative to bike sharing services in cities like New York and San Francisco.


There are reports that Renault, which left the US in 1987, is exploring the possibility of selling the car in Quebec, but entering an established market is risky business. Daimler, which owns Smart, has an established dealer and parts network in the United States already, making it easier to launch its sub-brand here, with modest success.


Renault has a strategic partnership with Nissan, so it’s possible the Twizy (or a variant) could make an appearance as a Nissan-badged product (might we suggest the Nissan Stem, to go along with the Leaf?). But this is America—where the little car has never flourished—so we’re not holding our collective breath, even if the Twizy would make for a badass little city car.



A $60 Gadget That Makes Car Hacking Far Easier


The average automobile today isn’t necessarily secured against hackers, so much as obscured from them: Digitally controlling a car’s electronics remains an arcane, specialized skill among security researchers. But that’s changing fast. And soon, it could take as little as $60 and a laptop to begin messing around with a car’s digital innards.


Tomorrow at the Black Hat Asia security conference in Singapore, 24-year-old Eric Evenchick plans to present a new device he calls the CANtact. The open source board, which he hopes to sell for between $60 and $100, connects on one end to a computer’s USB port, and on the other to a car or truck’s OBD2 port, a network port under its dashboard. That makes the CANtact a cheap interface between any PC and a vehicle’s controller area network or CAN bus, the collection of connected computers inside of every modern automobile that control everything from its windows to its brakes.


With just that go-between gadget and the open source software that Evenchick is releasing for free, he hopes to make car hacking a far cheaper and more automated process for amateurs. “I realized that there were no good tools for me to play around with this stuff outside of what the auto industry uses, and those are incredibly expensive,” Evenchick says, referring to products sold by companies like Vector that can cost tens of thousands of dollars. “I wanted to build a tool I can get out there, along with software to show that this stuff isn’t terribly complicated.”


The gadget isn’t intended for malicious car hacking. Instead, it’s meant to foster hobbyist car hacking and security research that can expose and help fix a car's vulnerabilities.




Over the last several years, researchers have shown that car hacking represents a real security threat. In 2013, for instance, Darpa-funded security researchers Chris Valasek and Charlie Miller showed (with me as their chosen crash-test dummy) that it was possible to send digital commands from a laptop connected to a car’s CAN bus that affected steering, slammed on brakes, or even disabled brakes at some speeds.

Evenchick’s gadget aims to make exactly that sort of testing more accessible to researchers. In their tests, Valasek and Miller used a $150 ECOM cable that they rewired by hand to connect to their test vehicles’ OBD2 ports. (Valasek says a stock cable capable of that connection would have cost $1,200.) Evenchick’s CANtact is designed to make that connection out of the box at a much lower cost.


The average coder isn’t familiar with the protocol most cars’ computers rely on to communicate. But Evenchick has written open source software for CANtact that automates much of the manual work of CAN bus hacking. Like the earlier work by Valasek and Miller, the CANtact is designed to send commands in Unified Diagnostics Services, the CAN protocol that auto mechanics use to communicate with electronic control units (or ECUs) throughout a vehicle. That allows anyone to write python scripts that can automatically trigger commands in a car’s digital network that range from turning off its “check engine” light to automatically pumping its brakes. “Most people have no idea there’s all this diagnostic stuff that someone who’s connected to the CAN bus can use to do all these interesting things,” says Evenchick. “What are the extent of those features? And what implementation problems exist that could be big security holes?”


For now, actually figuring out what a certain UDS command sent from the CANtact might do in a specific vehicle will largely be a matter of trial and error for amateur car hackers, says Evenchick. But by publishing its software on Github, he hopes the code will become a collection of different hackers’ techniques that target individual vehicle makes and models. “It would be awesome if people messing around with their cars… [they] could work together to build a library [of code] to do all this stuff,” says Evenchick. “You’re a Honda owner, and someone else is a Honda owner. If they find some cool things to do and you want to play around with it too, they can share it.”


The CANtact, of course, can only test security exploits that require physical access, not remote attacks on a car’s network. But the device does help to automate the testing of security exploits that would be possible once a hacker has already gained a wireless foothold on a car’s network. And the notion of a hacker gaining that sort of initial wireless foothold in a car’s network is more than theoretical. Researchers at the University of Washington and the University of California at San Diego demonstrated in 2011 that they could gain access to an unnamed car’s network through wireless attacks that included a Bluetooth connection, the car’s OnStar-like cellular radio, and even Android malware on the driver’s phone.


Evenchick says his CANtact gadget isn’t intended to make any sort of malicious car hacking easier. Instead, he argues, it’s meant to foster hobbyist car hacking and security research that can expose and help fix real vulnerabilities in the digital components of cars and trucks. Miller and Valasek’s earlier research, for example, served as a public demonstration that cars’ internal networks lack basic security protections. Their work led to Senator Edward Markey sending a series of questions to 20 automakers that eventually revealed widespread inattention to security and in some cases a potential lack of anti-hacking measures in their cars and trucks. Only seven of the companies said they used third party security auditing for their vehicles, and only two said they currently had features to respond to a hacker intrusion on their vehicles’ CAN buses.


The more attention and testing those car systems receive, Evenchick says, the more secure they’ll eventually become. “You don’t really own a device until you can open it up and tear it apart,” says Evenchick. “Your car is more connected than ever before. Just having people know what’s going on with cars and understand them better would be kind of nice.”



My Quest to Reengineer a Legendary Beer in a Dirty Kitchen


A few miles north of Portland, Maine, inside Allagash Brewing Company's gleaming fluorescent-lit beer factory, a heavy door leads into a climate-controlled room lined with barrels full of aging beer. Past those barrels, behind a second, smaller door, is one of craft brewing's most sacred spaces. In here, the thrumming industrial drone of bottling lines and keg washers fades away. Wooden casks stand silent sentry. Dust hangs heavy. Cobwebs lilt. The owner of Allagash, Rob Tod, sets a small green bottle of beer on an upturned cask. Its contents were aged in this very room. He pops the cork and pours a fragrant, foamy measure into a yellow plastic KOA coffee mug.


It's called Resurgam—Latin for “I shall rise again”—and it is the most remarkable beer I've ever tasted: vibrant, alive with sweet white-pear notes, a clean, tart razor's edge, and a subtle berry finish. It is at once fruity and earthy, rich and light, hazy and bright—strawberries in hay under a summer sun. Complex and graceful, Resurgam and the rare few beers like it represent a style of beer that's flatly, even belittlingly, called sour.


Behind the brewery, Allagash's brewmaster, Jason Perkins, leads me to a wooden shed. Inside, a shallow stainless-steel pool nearly fills a wood-paneled room. That pool is called a koelschip, and it's the key to Resurgam's complexity, the place where protobeer comes into contact with the horde of wild microbes that will ferment it into something special. “We don't use chemicals in here,” Perkins says, pointing out a filmy ring of grime around the tub. They clean with hot water, lest they interrupt the magic of the Maine microbes that make Allagash's sour beers its own.


As the lambic ferments in barrels, it releases foam through the staves. As the lambic ferments in barrels, it releases foam through the staves. Courtesy of Mathew Trogner

The hut is a shrine to localism, its wood reclaimed from trees cut down when the brewery expanded, its windows from an old church in town, its door from a nearby salvage yard, and its dirt blown in from the forest outside. Perkins and the other Allagash brewers want to capture where they are: the crisp air, the faint sea breeze, the spirit of the Maine woods. “We model our brewing after lambic production,” Perkins says, referring to the famous sour beers of Belgium. “But we were curious: If we did the same thing in a different part of the world, what would happen?”


The answer was Allagash's line of sours. Launched in 2007, they were the first lambic-style brews made in the United States. They're available only at the brewery, and new batches sell out within days. It's a cult-like devotion common in the sour world. Online beer forums are drool-sodden with reviews of unusual, expensive bottles and poetic descriptions of flavors and aromas like dandelion, unripe pear, green pineapple, and even “liquid farmyard,” “rotten oak,” and “crap-stained muck-spreader.” (The more masochistic the tasting notes, the higher the price tag.) According to the mythology surrounding lambics, the particular combination of microbes that makes those flavors possible—various species of yeast and other microbes that show up almost accidentally during a brewing process known as spontaneous fermentation—exists only in a few locations on Earth: the bright, perpetually autumnal Maine woods, for example. But above all, the verdant cherry orchards of the Zenne River Valley, southwest of Brussels. (When the city's famed sour brewery Cantillon updated its 115-year-old brewhouse, it saved the old ceiling tiles, because the brewers hoped the critical microflora were contained therein.)



William Bostwick


About


William Bostwick (@brewerstale) writes, bakes, and brews in San Francisco. Parts of this story appear in his book The Brewer’s Tale.




Call it microbial terroir. In winemaking, terroir refers to characteristic flavor that comes from where the grapes were grown and the wine was made. It is geography we can taste, whether it's the limestone-laden soil of the Champagne hills or the cherry-scented air on a spring day in Brussels. But if microbial terroir defines a sour beer's destiny, then understanding the biology of those microorganisms should be enough to let anyone manufacture as good a sour as Allagash or Cantillon. I don't live in the woods—I make beer on a chipped four-burner, five stories above San Francisco's Mission District. To purists, making a sour here would be like growing world-class Pinot in Times Square. The best way to find out if they're right: brew one myself.


Wooden ceilings at Allagash are home to its sour-defining microbes. Wooden ceilings at Allagash are home to its sour-defining microbes.

Courtesy of Mathew Trogner

Before Louis Pasteur uncovered the microbial basics of fermentation, the creation of beer seemed magical. For centuries, the microflora that turn vegetables to pickles, milk to yogurt, and grain porridge to beer—each process a kind of fermentation—were revered and unknown. Brewing was the domain of ritual and prayer. An early term for yeast, the then-unknown stuff that turned boiled grain into beer, was Goddesgoode—“God is good.” Today, of course, foodies know they have Lactobacillus, lactic-acid-making bacteria, to thank for pickles and yogurt, and a species of yeast called Saccharomyces cerevisiae to credit for bread and beer. But over a century ago brewers figured out that another genus of yeast, Brettanomyces—a sign of spoilage in most beers—was responsible in part for the weird flavors in lambics.


Fermenting yeasts produce more than just ethanol and carbon dioxide. They make flavorful, aromatic molecules: acids and esters. But which ones make which ones? In the past the shortcut explanation was terroir—something about the location, the specific microorganisms native to a place. Even today no one has a better answer. “We know what the acids and esters are, and how they're made,” says Jim Withee, founder and CEO of GigaYeast, a beer yeast manufacturer in Belmont, California. “But not why—and most curiously, not what evolutionary and environmental advantage they have. Why has that genetic code adapted to that environment?”


If you believe the hype, the best wild beermaking microbes come from the golden fields of Belgium's Pajottenland—more specifically, the tiny town of Lembeek, an early medieval brewing hub. But until 2012 no one really knew which microbes. That's when a team of researchers applied modern genetic sequencing technologies to sour beers. They found quite a community and laid bare some of the secrets of the fabled lambic.


A brewer enters the shed that houses the brew- ery’s koelschip. A brewer enters the shed that houses the brewery’s koelschip.

Courtesy of Mathew Trogner


The first organisms to take root during fermentation, the researchers learned, are bad ones indeed: bacteria like Enterobacter cloacae (responsible for urinary tract infections) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (yes, like a respiratory infection). In theory they're dangerous. But they're only temporary tenants, doing their work and then dying before they can do any harm to fetishistic fans of sours. Among other compounds, they produce acetic acid—vinegar—which gives some lambics a pleasant tang. More than that, though, they break down polysaccharide sugars—those made of multiple subunits—into the smaller sugar molecules that yeast can digest.


That's what makes it possible for S. cerevisiae to move in. The carbon dioxide it makes bubbles away through the barrel staves; the ethanol stays. But yeast cells are smoky little engines that give off clouds of fragrant and flavorful molecules too. An enzyme in S. cerevisiae called alcohol acetyl transferase, for example, connects the alcohol with a molecule called acetyl-CoA to make banana-y isoamyl acetate and pearlike ethyl acetate.


When the yeast die, they make way for the next wave of organisms. Pediococcus—another genus of bacteria—teams up with Brettanomyces to eat the complex, longer sugar molecules that S. cerevisiae miss. Pediococcus produces lactic acid, lambic's dominant flavor note, but can also emit funkier flavors such as buttery diacetyl. And besides forming a goopy film on top called a pellicle, which allows it to access oxygen while sealing off the beer below, Brettanomyces also makes stuff like caprylic acid (goat smell) and ethyl lactate (horse-blanket smell). They're what make a farmhouse beer taste like a farm.


Allagash Coolship Resurgam


Russian River Beatification


Jolly Pumpkin Artisan Ales Bam Bière


Sam Adams KMF Grand Cru


Cantillon Rosé de Gambrinus


Gueuze Tilquin à l’ancienne


Those bugs are everywhere. But sticklers say that unless the microbes are Belgian, a sour beer is not a lambic. So to brew my first sour, I figured I'd better import the right critters. For that, I turned to White Labs, a San Diego-based company that cultivates and sells yeast. In a move unusual for a microbiology firm, the company also has a tasting room—dozens of beers identical except for the yeast. The idea is to show off the flavors brought by the yeast alone—from WLP530 Abbey Ale to WLP885 Zurich Lager. But with sour beers now such a prize, White Labs has begun culturing Belgian-style bacteria as well. “In Belgium, their cultures are unique,” says Neva Parker, head of the lab. “What we do is try to re-create that.”


I went with White Labs Belgian Sour Mix 1. Parker told me it was a mishmash of Saccharomyces, Lactobacillus, and a wet-hay-scented kind of Brettanomyces bruxellensis common around the famous Cantillon brewery in Brussels.


I steeped cracked grain in a soup pot on my stove, boiling the result with a handful of crushed, pelletized hops—the preservative flowers add some complementary bitterness and keep the beer safe from truly poisonous bacterial infection. Then I chilled this wort on a 5-pound bag of ice in my sink, siphoned it into an empty cider jug, and upended the little vial of grayish slurry from White Labs. After about a day it started bubbling. (God is good!) Then nothing. I waited. A thin film began to slick its surface, sea-monkey-like flecks dove and rose in the hazy brew. I waited. And waited. And then plum forgot about it. After a year in my pantry, all the gunk had settled in a layer of gray-white sediment—dead cells that brewers call trub—and the beer cleared. I ventured a sip.


It was terrible. This was liquid fire—it actually hurt to drink. The sourness didn't blossom in layers of fruit and herbs, didn't ripple into lingering furrows of flavor—it stabbed.


I poured the whole thing down the sink.


What went wrong? I had used the best Belgian bugs and made as close to a Belgian beer as I could. Why had I failed?


And then it hit me: I was using terroir, all right. But it was the wrong terroir.


Brewers can sample the effects of individual yeast strains at White Labs’ tasting room. Brewers can sample the effects of individual yeast strains at White Labs’ tasting room. Benjamin Rasmussen

“How to: Capture Wild Yeast” is one of the most vibrant and—fair warning—time-consuming threads on Home Brew Talk, the online forum for home brewers. There, a gloriously goofy mix of nerds and poets engage in an endless game of one-upmanship: Who can make the most natural, most spontaneous, most authentic sour beer, and who can describe it in the most florid prose. Brewers show off Technicolor petri dishes and bulging yogurt tubs—pellicle porn. When the beers work, out come the similes: banana, honey, eucalyptus, egg, dill, cinnamon, pineapple, mango, pepper, bubblegum. “Feet with a hint of sour milk,” “like a medium-stinky Camembert,” “rhino farts mixed with sour fruit.” And this is bragging.


Each home brewer has his own sour-making methods. The guidance I found there ranged from “if you happen to own a dye-terminator capillary sequencer …” to “squash a pollen-laden honeybee on a plate.” I didn't have a sequencer, let alone a backyard orchard or koelschip.


But, I realized, I did have a million-microbe colony at my disposal. Better still, it was special. I had, on the middle shelf of my fridge, an old Prego jar full of sourdough starter.


Bread is sort of the inverse of beer. Both involve carbon dioxide and ethanol. But beer captures the ethanol while an understated foam rises to the top; bread solidifies the foam while the alcohol bakes off. Sourdough starters, like lambics, are born spontaneously. A wet dough left uncovered will catch wild yeast from the air. Bakers keep the infected dough alive with regular feedings and pass it on, loaf to loaf, baker to baker, generation to generation. As with lambics, folklore reigns. One San Francisco bakery claims its starter dates to the gold rush.


The best sourdoughs command the same sort of cultish reverence as the best sour beers and for years were thought to come only from a few places. San Francisco's loaves are so famous, a Lactobacillus species is named after the city: L. sanfranciscensis, known for molecules like fruity isobutanol, butter-sweet acetoin, and grassy 1-hexanol.


I had a plan. I put another pot of cracked grain on the stove. I crushed in a handful of the same hops and siphoned the cooled-down wort into the same cider jug. But this time, instead of a lab-sealed tube, I pitched in a spoonful of my sourdough starter. Again, I waited.


But I wasn't working blind. I'd sent a sample of my starter to Kelvin Chan at the genome lab SeqMatic, to identify the fungi and bacteria it contained. As I'd expected, Chan found lots of Lactobacillus, mostly sanfranciscensis. Some Saccharomyces. But then the weird stuff emerged. SeqMatic's machine found Pichia, a whole other yeast genus. “It isn't commonly seen, and in this case there was more of it than Saccharomyces,” Chan says. He also found genetic signatures for photosynthetic bacteria that, well, probably came from my sink. “We might just be picking up the chloroplast DNA of the wheat,” he says. “That's the drawback to seeing everything. You see everything, even if it's not living.”


The lab offers nearly 300 strains, including this one with Belgian heritage. The lab offers nearly 300 strains, including this one with Belgian heritage. Benjamin Rasmussen

Everything. This, I realized, might be where terroir resides. The antiseptic lab-grown culture I'd tried had left out these extras—the scrubby underbrush, the in-between organisms that knit the whole ecosystem together. Those organisms suggest a far more complex microbial ecology than I expected, one based not so much in geography, but in process. B. bruxellensis isn't unique to Brussels—I'd bought mine from a lab in San Diego, after all—but those same microorganisms will make different flavors depending not just on where but on how their stewards maintain their cultures. In the case of the beer I was making, that meant the frequency and duration with which I'd fed (or “refreshed”) my starter, its storage temperature, the type of flour and carbohydrates and nutrients it contained, the kind of water I used (tap? bottled?), even the vigorousness with which I stirred the critters—every variable favors certain bacteria and yeasts over others. The same is true for those tiles over Cantillon's fermentation pools. An ecosystem's worth of conditions, from temperature to humidity to competing fungi and bacteria, influence what exists at life's smallest scale. Every room, every forest, every home brewer's stovetop creates, over and over again, its own microbiome.


Pichia is aerobic—it likes oxygen. Saccharomyces doesn't; perhaps I stir too much. And Pichia prefers warmer temperatures, which might also explain the presence of a touch of vinegary Acetobacter and L. plantarum. Some bakers refresh with distilled water, or bottled—my tap-water-and-flour mixture favors Saccharomyces and its bready flavors over the funky esters of Brettanomyces, which wasn't present at all.


So here is the reality: Terroir is more than just a country or a city. It's a kitchen. My kitchen. My sourdough starter is San Franciscan, but more than that it's mine—refreshed occasionally, whenever I remembered, with half a cup of tap water (or so) and half a cup(ish) of bulk-bin flour, stored in a noisy fridge with a broken icemaker for the last three years.


Sours can take months to fully develop, but I got impatient. After two weeks I popped the air lock off the top of the cider jug with my sourdough beer, found a glass, and poured a frothy half cup. I sniffed first—it was fresh, with a bit of a bakery's sweetness and tang. I took a sip.


OK, it didn't have the bright pop of Allagash's Resurgam. But it was fine beer, stress-free to make and refreshing—bready and light, with the crunchy snap of a good loaf. You might not line up outside my apartment for a taste, but it was definitely a sour worth drinking. I wouldn't sing its funky glory to Home Brew Talk, but that was never quite the point. It tasted great—to me.



Mining the secrets of carbohydrates for new leads on antibiotics

Laura Kiessling, Ph.D., thrives on steep learning curves. So when she started her research lab, she took a risk and plunged into the wide-open field of carbohydrates, which despite their ubiquity and notoriety for expanding waistlines, have many secrets. Now, her team has stumbled on something about these molecules that opens up new possibilities for fighting bacteria that are resistant to known antibiotics.



She will present her latest discovery during "The Fred Kavli Innovations in Chemistry Lecture" at the 249th National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS).


Carbohydrates' infamous role in weight gain underrepresents to an enormous degree what this group of molecules is responsible for, explains Kiessling, a professor of chemistry and biochemistry and the director of the Keck Center for Chemical Genomics at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.


"Every cell on the planet wears a coat of carbohydrates -- we all need them," she says. "And those carbohydrates play a lot of roles. For example, blood type is determined by the carbohydrates on our red blood cell surfaces. They're also used in vaccines and are important for development."


A major challenge to understanding these molecules is that so far, there is no simple code to help scientists figure out what carbohydrates are produced by which cells or why. As scientists are finding out, this information could be particularly important when it comes to fighting bacteria. And it's on this front where Kiessling saw tremendous opportunity.


"My lab is interested in the differences between the carbohydrates that humans and microbes put on their surfaces," she says. "Most of the antibiotics we have don't exploit those differences."


If scientists could specifically target bacterial carbohydrates, it would open up a new field in antibiotic research. Kiessling's lab has potentially hit upon such a way.


"It was really like a detective story with twists and turns," she says.


Her team had been searching for a way to disrupt bacteria's essential carbohydrate-making machinery. Instead they discovered that the human protein they were studying possesses a powerful trait -- the ability to recognize carbohydrates unique to microbial cells. It was an unexpected but significant finding.


"A human protein that is selective for microbes could be harnessed to deliver an antibiotic or toxin to kill harmful bacteria without hurting human cells," Kiessling explains. "It could also be used to detect and diagnose bacterial infections.


"The exciting part is that this could be a part of human immunity that we're just beginning to reveal," she says. "And maybe we have had within us all along a key to combatting microbial infections that we haven't yet mined."




Story Source:


The above story is based on materials provided by American Chemical Society (ACS) . Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.



The Real Star of Bloodline Isn’t Who You Thought It Would Be

Kyle Chandler (as John Rayburn) and Ben Mendelsohn (as Danny Rayburn) in the Netflix Original Series Bloodline. Kyle Chandler (as John Rayburn) and Ben Mendelsohn (as Danny Rayburn) in the Netflix Original Series Bloodline. Saeed Adyani/Netflix



As last week’s premiere of Netflix’s Bloodline drew near, most of the media attention focused on Kyle Chandler—including a rollicking ride-along profile in The Hollywood Reporter. And that makes sense; it’s his triumphant return to television after his Emmy-winning turn as Coach Eric Taylor on Friday Night Lights. But while Chandler’s the one delivering the voiceovers on Netflix’s highly-touted family drama, he’s not really the lead on Bloodline. That honor stealthily goes to Australian actor Ben Mendelsohn, who takes yet another small step toward the kind of big-time recognition his recent performances deserve.


Set in the Florida Keys, Bloodline centers on the Rayburn family: parents Robert (Sam Shepard) and Sally (Sissy Spacek) run a successful and beloved inn; John (Chandler) is a county sheriff; Meg (Linda Cardellini) works as an attorney; Kevin (Norbert Leo Butz) works at a local harbor and has his father’s anger issues. The pilot begins as eldest son and black sheep Danny (Mendelsohn) returns home. He’s the character who catalyzes all the action in one way or another, from his father’s trauma over a past tragic accident to his brothers’ guilt over lying after witnessing a violent incident as kids. Everything from the various Rayburn family history threads depend on Danny sticking around, waiting to discover one key detail he can use to quench his bitterness and twist one his siblings into knots. He’s the dangerously calm eye at the center of a familial hurricane, causing secrets to shake loose and wounds of the past to sting once more. It’s the most important part in the story, which is exactly why the show’s creators (Daniel Zelman and Damages creators Todd and Glenn Kessler) cast Mendelsohn as soon as they’d landed Chandler.


Ben Mendelsohn as Danny Rayburn in Bloodline. Ben Mendelsohn as Danny Rayburn in Bloodline. Saeed Adyani/Netflix

Mendelsohn has been on the fringes of some notable films in the past five years, but he’s been a high-profile actor for decades. He was a young heartthrob in Australian films and television shows dating back in the 1980s, when he won an Australian Oscar (now known as the AACTAs) for Best Supporting Actor as the roguish rugby player who couldn’t stay out of trouble in The Year My Voice Broke (http://ift.tt/1BL5HAQ). He came up alongside other Aussie actors like Russell Crowe, Guy Pearce, and Noah Taylor—but whereas the other three jumped to the US and the UK to find international fame, Mendelsohn mostly remained in Australia, only occasionally popping up in bigger international films like The New World, Knowing, and Baz Luhrmann’s Australia.


But when Jackie Weaver scored a Best Supporting Actress Academdy Award nomination for Australian drama Animal Kingdom in 2010—a movie in which Mendelsohn appeared alongside her—Hollywood paid attention. That film won Mendelsohn another AACTA, but it also led to more roles in America. He played a drug-addled crook in Andrew Dominik’s Killing Them Softly, the grimy mentor and bank robbing partner to Ryan Gosling’s motorcycle stuntman in The Place Beyond The Pines, Jessa’s father on HBO’s Girls, and most visibly in The Dark Knight Returns as the sniveling Wayne Enterprises board member who Bane.


Earlier this year, Mendelsohn showed up in two Sundance films this year that got picked up for distribution: frontier period piece Slow West, and Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck’s gambling film Mississippi Grind. “I’m embarrassed to admit it, but the first time I had ever seen [him] was in The Place Beyond the Pines,” says Fleck. “But he has such a wonderful presence that we just kind of fell in love with him on that first meeting. We just looked at each other, nodded, and offered him the part on the spot without even consulting with our producing team.”


Two years ago in a Grantland piece around the release of The Place Beyond The Pines, Sean Fennessey posited that Mendelsohn “seems one starring role—might we suggest a downtrodden garbageman-turned-bankrobber?—away from transitioning out of That Guy.” Danny Rayburn may not be a sanitation worker, but it’s a role that Mendelsohn was born to play—and might just the casting bridge he needed.



Tiny bio-robot is a germ suited-up with graphene quantum dots

As nanotechnology makes possible a world of machines too tiny to see, researchers are finding ways to combine living organisms with nonliving machinery to solve a variety of problems.



Like other first-generation bio-robots, the new nanobot engineered at the University of Illinois at Chicago is a far cry from Robocop. It's a robotic germ.


UIC researchers created an electromechanical device -- a humidity sensor -- on a bacterial spore. They call it NERD, for Nano-Electro-Robotic Device. The report is online at Scientific Reports, a Nature open access journal.


"We've taken a spore from a bacteria, and put graphene quantum dots on its surface -- and then attached two electrodes on either side of the spore," said Vikas Berry, UIC associate professor of chemical engineering and principal investigator on the study.


"Then we change the humidity around the spore," he said.


When the humidity drops, the spore shrinks as water is pushed out. As it shrinks, the quantum dots come closer together, increasing their conductivity, as measured by the electrodes.


"We get a very clean response -- a very sharp change the moment we change humidity," Berry said. The response was 10 times faster, he said, than a sensor made with the most advanced human-made water-absorbing polymers.


There was also better sensitivity in extreme low-pressure, low-humidity situations. "We can go all the way down to a vacuum and see a response," said Berry, which is important in applications where humidity must be kept low, for example, to prevent corrosion or food spoilage. "It's also important in space applications, where any change in humidity could signal a leak," he said.


Currently available sensors increase in sensitivity as humidity rises, Berry said. NERD's sensitivity is actually higher at low humidity.


"This is a fascinating device," Berry said. "Here we have a biological entity. We've made the sensor on the surface of these spores, with the spore a very active complement to this device. The biological complement is actually working towards responding to stimuli and providing information."


T. S. Sreeprasad and Phong Nguyen of UIC were lead co-authors on the study. Sreeprasad, a postdoctoral fellow, is now at Rice University in Houston. Ahmed Alshogeathri, Luke Hibbeler, Fabian Martinez and Nolan McNeiland, undergraduate students from Kansas State University, were also co-authors on the paper.


The study was supported by the Terry C. Johnson Center for Basic Cancer Research and partial support from the National Science Foundation (CMMI-1054877, CMMI-0939523 and CMMI-1030963) and the Office of Naval Research (N000141110767).




Story Source:


The above story is based on materials provided by University of Illinois at Chicago . The original article was written by Jeanne Galatzer-Levy. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.



Thanks to Google, TV Ads Are About to Start Watching You


Google is about to make ads on television work just like ads on the web. Through Google, advertisers will know how many times their ads were viewed. They’ll be able to target audiences based on location and viewing history. In other words, TV advertisers will have access to the same audience intel online advertisers take for granted.


Finally, after all this time, your TV is going to know as much about you as your web browser.


This stands in stark contrast to the way ads on television have traditionally been sold. Advertisers have had to estimate the reach of the commercials based on services such as Nielsen ratings and have only been able to target ads based on specific shows, not on specific viewers. That’s started to change in recent years, but now that Google is in the game, a future where TV ads work like the web feels inevitable.


What if you could say, I just bought a car, so don't show me ads for car dealerships. That would save advertisers a lot of money. Randy Giusto


Google announced a trial run of its new TV ad-targeting capability in its product forum for Google Fiber, its super-fast internet service available in select US cities. Subscribers to its cable-like Fiber TV package in Kansas City will be the first test subjects for the experiment, which was first reported by AdWeek. “These ads will show during existing ad breaks, along with national ads, on live TV and DVR-recorded programs,” Google said.


The ads will be delivered in real time and matched to geography, the type of show being watched and the viewer’s history. Customers will have the choice to opt out of being shown ads based on their viewing history, much like users of Google’s web services can opt out of being targeted based on browsing history. It’s not clear what “viewing history” means, how granular that opt-out process will be, or whether this type of targeting will be available to both national and local advertisers.


Cable Plays Catch-Up


In many ways, this is exactly what privacy advocates feared Google Fiber would become: yet another way for Google to collect even more data about you. It would be easy to make a “TV watches you” crack, but this is how advertising has worked on the web for at least fifteen years. Broadcast media, meanwhile, has been largely stuck in the dark ages, unable to match advertising to individual viewers or even say with any certainty how many people saw any given ad. But this has started to change.


The issue isn’t entirely technological. Cable companies and broadcasters haven’t wanted to charge per view for advertising because, well, they’d probably make a lot less money that way, says Randy Giusto, the vice president of research firm Outsell. “The advertisers want them to prove that the ads are being seen, but it’s never been in the cable operators’ best interest to show those numbers,” he says.


Today, however, advertisers have more options for reaching audiences than ever. For example, political campaigns are now able to measure and test the impact of their online advertising, non-profit organizations can use information gathered from petition sites to target only the most passionate people for donations, and retailers can rely on affiliate advertising they only pay for if someone actually makes purchase.


As more advertising shifts to the web and mobile, it only makes sense for cable companies to offer more measurability, even if it means charging less for ad time in the long run. Less money is better than no money at all.


A company called VisibleWorld has long offered advertisers the ability to target cable television ads at the household level, and offers many tools to automatically customize ads based on the region and demographic they’ll likely reach. The Wall Street Journal reported that Comcast is in talks to buy the company. Meanwhile, NBCUniversal is already offering targeted advertising based on Comcast’s set-top-box data, and other providers such as Cablevision and DirecTV are also offering data-driven ad targeting.


As the technology evolves, and if viewers are given more control over what they want to see, this could open a whole new range of possibilities, Giusto says. “What if you could say ‘I just bought a car, so don’t show me ads for car dealerships,” he says. “That would save advertisers a lot of money.”


Convergence


This approach is old hat on the web, but that doesn’t mean there won’t be privacy concerns. Ad targeting and data collection online are already subject to much debate and regulator scrutiny. According to Pew Research, 64 percent of Americans believe the government should do more regulate how advertisers use personal information. And there are social norms to consider. We’re not used to the idea that the shows we watch will be logged and turned into advertising fodder. This may have already been going on for years, thanks to set-top boxes, but Google’s move could raise greater awareness of the practice and finally cause a backlash.


Still, with new services like the Dish Networks’ Sling, Sony’s PlayStation Vue and Apple’s long rumored TV streaming service poised to make paying for a separate television subscription redundant, the difference between TV and internet will only continue to blur. That blurring will include a melding of business models, one where knowing exactly what viewers are watching will be worth a lot more than an educated guess.